jhiaxus-soup:

eabevella:

obviousepiphany:

tshifty:

whyyoustabbedme:

JK Rowling only said Dumbledore was gay because there weren’t any risks, the books were finished. Now she’s decided they aren’t, there are risks again and she’s chosen the same spineless path she’s used to. She is no LGBTQ ally.

the saddest death in harry potter is my respect for jk rowling.

I don’t think I’ve seen that sentence in a more appropriate context

Well, they’re not gonna risk it for the chinese market *shrugs*

yeah, don’t countries who are anti censor lgbt+ content anyways before airing the product?

JK Rowling didn’t write any lgbt+ stuffs in the books, nor in the movies (not any that I remember), so they are safe to be aired in anti lgbt+ countries. Those countries don’t care about what she wrote on twitter since it’s not shown in the “canon” materials. However, if the new movie did show Dumbledore as gay, and  the movie company/JK Rowling confirm this is the case for the movie, those countries will 100% ban it. (Like they did for Beauty and the Beast or whatever movie that has a gay couple in the background)

發表留言

這個網站採用 Akismet 服務減少垃圾留言。進一步了解 Akismet 如何處理網站訪客的留言資料